Blawg IT-Internet Patent, Trademark and Copyright Issues with Attorney Brett Trout

Iowa's First Law Blog - Since 2003

Sunday, October 14, 2007

Patent It and They Will Come (Maybe)


Should I Get a Patent?
As a patent attorney, I get that question a lot. Unlike a lot of patent attorneys however, my first answer is typically not an emphatic “Yes.” A good patent is like a safety deposit box. Very valuable, assuming you have something valuable to protect. A patent is not going to sell your invention for you. The only thing a patent can do is to stop other people from selling your invention. If no one is interested in buying your invention, no one else is interested in selling it, making your patent rather useless.

If Not Me, Who?

I long ago gave up trying to guess whether a new invention was going to make money. I have had clients walk into my office, with “can't miss” inventions, that missed by a rather wide margin. On the other hand, one of the most successful, albeit wacky, inventions I have ever had the pleasure to patent was invented by a client I nearly politely shuffled out of my office in my own misguided attempt to keep him from wasting his money. What changed my mind was the inventor's knowledge of marketing and his vast array of industry contacts, things the “can't miss” inventors never bothered to consider.

Will It Sell?
Now, much wiser (and wizened for that matter) when a client asks me if they should get a patent on an invention, I typically respond with another question. “What kind of sales do you expect, and how do anticipate getting those sales?” If the inventor details prior successful performance in a similar market, filing a patent is probably a pretty good idea. If the inventor does not have the first clue about marketing, but figures he or she will “patent it and they will come” I encourage them to prepare a business plan detailing proposed marketing efforts and anticipated sales. In between those two extremes, my advice still leans in those directions, albeit to a lesser degree.

How Do I Get a Patent?

Obtaining a patent involves filing a patent application which describes the parameters of your invention. Even for a skilled patent attorney, drafting a patent application is a very time consuming process, often taking several weeks to complete. Once the application is completed, it is filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Two to three years later (yep you read that right), the USPTO examines the patent against all of the other seven million patents in the USPTO (well maybe not all). If your patent application is very broad (which it should be), it is very likely that the USPTO will reject most, if not all of the patent protection you are claiming. Assuming you indeed have something novel, you fight back and forth with the USPTO, possibly for years until you either give up, or the USPTO grants you a patent.

Can I Patent It Myself?
While it is theoretically possible to obtain a patent on your own, even the USPTO recommends obtaining the learned counsel of an experienced patent attorney. Patent attorney are attorneys with a science background, who have passed a separate “Patent Bar” exam, demonstrating their knowledge and skills in the patent drafting arena. Not all patent attorneys are created alike, just like all patents are not created alike. While you often get what you pay for, there are some inexpensive patent attorneys who draft very good patents and expensive patent attorneys who draft very bad patents. To find a good patent attorney, get a recommendation from someone who has actually obtained a patent with the attorney. The problem with drafting your patent yourself or hiring a bad patent attorney, is that by the time you realize you have made a grave mistake, the most valuable aspect of your invention may be irretrievably cast into the public domain.

Its All About The Marketing
It's much better to have a great marketing plan and a bad invention, than a great invention and a terrible marketing plan. Sound strange coming from someone who earns a living drafting patents and openly professes the inability to market inventions? Well that is the way it is. What about those invention promotion companies? I have yet to run across one that is not a scam or, at the very least extraordinarily ineffectual at parlaying an invention into pictures of dead presidents. If you believe in your invention, but know you are not a marketer, team up with someone who is. Better yet, find an investor with a strong marketing background, preferably with experience marketing your type of product. If you are lousy at marketing, at the very least, team up with someone who has access to marketers.

That Being Said
Patents can be quite valuable. Several are valued at over $1 billion apiece. Also, patents can be marketing tools themselves. Many advertisements tout the patented nature of the product as one of its most impressive features. Patents can be the source of revenue streams, generating millions of dollars in licensing fees from eager licensees. Patents also impress potential investors. Many investors require patent protection be in the works before they will even talk to you. Patents can do things money can't. Good patents can carve out a broad swath of exclusive sales territory and may even “buy” your way out of a potentially crippling cross-infringement suit by your closest competitor. Patents can be some of the most worthless or valuable assets on the planet. Compiling an effective marketing strategy before diving into the patent process is often the difference between whether the “safe” your patent attorney constructs for you contains a lump of coal or the Hope diamond.


Brett Trout

Labels: ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

All Your Law in One Convenient Package


Iowa Corporate attorney Rush Nigut is the brains behind the new Iowa Law Blog. Members of Rush's West Des Moines law firm Sullivan & Ward author posts on many areas of Iowa law, including:

* Utility law;
* Business Law;
* Trust and Estates;
* Trial and Mediation;
* Employment Law;
* Regulatory Compliance;
* Family Law; and
* Real Estate

Although the site looks great and is filled with fantastic content, I would advise everyone to boycott the blog. While the Iowa Law Blog indeed has a stable of great bloggers, including the award-winning blogger Rush Nigut, they are keeping one of their most skilled athletes on the bench. I am willing to bite the bullet, and deny myself access to this valuable content until Sullivan & Ward member Lawrence McLellan gets in the game and imparts some of his litigation prowess onto us in the form of at least one blog post. I invite you to do the same.

It is a gamble for sure, but knowing Larry, I am confident he will succumb to his adoring fans and grace us with a sheer stunner of a post. If, however, you feel you simply cannot wait, feel free to expedite the process by contacting Larry directly at lmclellan@sullivan-ward.com. Until then, we will just have to cross our collective fingers.

(Thanks for the photo Rush. BTW/Nice French Manicure)

Brett Trout

Labels: , ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

Chris Pirillo Talks CyberLaw

CyberLaw: A Legal Arsenal For Online Business Chris Pirillo, erstwhile Iowan and now one of the most famous people on the Internet (Google "Chris" if you doubt me) has just released a video interview with your's truly. The interview discusses my new book, Cyberlaw: A Legal For Online Business, covering the most common online legal questions asked by everyone from bloggers to businesses.

Chris' video series is quickly becoming a massive collection of priceless tidbits of Cyberknowledge. Check out the interview here and the whole collection of Chris' invaluable videos here.


Brett Trout


Labels:

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Monday, October 08, 2007

RIAA "The Rhythm is Gonna Get You"


Welcome to the jungle Ms. Jammie Thomas, single mother of two. November rain came a month early when just last Thursday a Minnesota jury found the Native American liable for illegal file sharing. I save the best for last. The verdict was for $222,000, which likely left Ms. Thomas cryin'. For the RIAA, the verdict was nothing but hella good, leaving the RIAA now and forever a very valuable precedent in its possession.

After being contacted by the RIAA for illegal file sharing, Ms. Thomas' indignation was coming out of the heart. She felt the RIAA was building a mystery based upon what she felt must have been somebody hacking or spoofing her account to make it look she was the one committing the copyright infringement. Her don't stop believing attitude continued to take her one step closer to the verdict she faithfully felt in her one honest heart the jury had to hand down.

Deciding let's wait awhile, Ms. Sullivan and her attorney refused to settle with the RIAA, opting instead for the here we are, come and get us approach. Unfortunately, the iris popping verdict leaves nothing but bills, bills, bills in her future.

While Ms. Sullivan is indeed mulling over an appeal, she does not want to throw the baby out with the bathwater. To appeal she still has to come up with the money in the interim. If she wants to continue the fight, she will likely have to come up with even more cash, possibly asking friends, family, altruistic lawyers and different people to "pour some sugar on me" in the form of donations.

In an effort to prevent this precedent from increasing the weight of the RIAA'a already heavy hand, I say file the appeal and run baby run. But then again, I am not the one at risk of turning into a basket case tousling with the RIAA for the next year or more. (I'm actually surprisingly bold from the sidelines).

Oh yeah, the 24 tracks Ms. Sullivan was accused of making available online? Read the above post a little more closely to find them all. Cheaters can check out the more mundane list here.

Brett Trout

Labels: , ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

Protecting Your Blog's Intellectual Property


Intellectual Property
Wow. Intellectual Property. It's quite a mouthful. Sure, it's something you hear international playboy/patent attorneys throw around all of the time, but what does it actually mean? Intellectual property refers to laws that allow you claim ownership over certain intangible creations, like inventions, books, movies and trademarks. Next time you are in Monte Carlo playing Baccarat at the big boy table, try slipping it into the conversation. The knowing winks from around the table will indicate you have used it correctly.

IP and Blogs
Okay. You know what it means, but how does intellectual property relate to blogs. Intellectual property is that part of the blog you own. Most bloggers have a copyright in their content and a trademark on their name and do not even know it. Some bloggers even have valuable intellectual property in their domain name, patentable process and/or the trade secrets embodied in email lists and what goes on behind the scenes. Unfortunately, failure to properly protect this intellectual property can cause it to move into the public domain and be lost forever.


Domain Names
While patents are expensive and trade secrets merely involve keeping the information confidential, nearly every blog has the potential for domain name, copyright and trademark protection. Domain names are given on a first come first serve basis. If you have a http://blawgit.blogspot.com blog address through blogger.com or similar service, you may wish to grab the http://www.bretttrout.com domain name sooner, rather than later. For a few dollars, you can grab your domain name, which a cybersquatter may hold hostage for thousands of dollars a year from now.

Trademarks
If your blog or podcast has a unique name, you may want to obtain a federal trademark registration on it. As soon as you use the trademark in commerce (use it to identify your posts) you have “common law” rights in the trademark. While common law rights are important, a federal trademark registration provides for triple damages and recovery of your attorney fees if someone willfully infringes your trademark. The great thing about these increased penalties is that defendants run scared, rather than fight; something that turns out to be very valuable when you are paying your intellectual property attorney $500/hr to defend your rights. You can check out the Trademark Office for free online at www.uspto.gov to see if anyone has beaten you to your registration. While you can register your own federal trademark for a little over $300, paying $1200 for a trademark attorney to do it right will pay large dividends if you ever have to sue someone for infringement.

Copyrights
Like trademark protection, you have copyright protection as soon as you post a blog. Strangely, the same protection does not automatically apply to podcasts. You have to make sure you record a copy of the podcast to have copyright automatically attach. In either case, you need to register the copyright if you ever want to sue anyone for infringing your copyright. Since the Copyright Office does not compare your registration against previous registrations like the Patent and Trademark Office, Copyright registration is much cheaper. Registering your copyright yourself runs about $45, while enlisting the help of a qualified Copyright attorney runs about $200.

Knowledge is the Key
Whether your blog or podcast is associated with copyrightable material, valuable trademarks, trade secrets, domain names or even patentable subject matter you should at least know what you own. It is important to meet with an intellectual property attorney experienced in working with bloggers to tell you what you have and how to protect it. Often, an initial meeting with an intellectual property attorney is free and you do not incur any charges until you actually pursue formal protection. Even if you decide not to go any further, it is a good idea at least to find out what exactly what you own and your options for protecting your intellectual property.


Brett Trout


Labels: , , ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button